Tony Blair's speech to the British labour party conference, Brighton, 2nd October, 2001.
The Millennium
a moment in time. But it
the events of 11 September
marked a turning point in
, where we confront the dangers
the future and assess the
facing humankind.
It was a
. An act of evil. From
nation, goes our deepest sympathy
prayers for the victims and
profound solidarity with the American
.
We were with you at
first. We will stay with
to the last.
Just
weeks ago, in New York,
the church service I met
of the families of the
victims.
It was in many
a very British occasion. Tea
biscuits. It was raining outside.
the edge of the room,
making small talk, trying to
normal people in an abnormal
. And as you crossed the
, you felt the longing and
; hands clutching photos of sons
daughters, wives and husbands; imploring
to believe them when they
there was still an outside
of their loved ones being
alive, when you knew in
that all hope was gone.
then a middle aged mother
you in the eyes and
you her only son has
, and asks you: why?
I
you: you do not feel
the most powerful person in
country at times like that.
there is no answer. There
no justification for their pain.
son did nothing wrong. The
, seven months pregnant, whose child
never know its father, did
wrong.
They don't want
. They want something better in
of their loved ones.
believe their memorial can and
be greater than simply the
of the guilty. It is
out of the shadow of
evil, should emerge lasting good:
of the machinery of terrorism
it is found; hope amongst
nations of a new beginning
we seek to resolve differences
a calm and ordered way;
understanding between nations and between
; and above all justice and
for the poor and dispossessed,
that people everywhere can see
chance of a better future
the hard work and creative
of the free citizen, not
violence and savagery of the
.
I know that here in
people are anxious, even a
frightened. I understand that. People
we must act but they
what might follow.
They worry
the economy and talk of
.
And, of course there are
; it is a new situation.
the fundamentals of the US,
and European economies are strong.
reasonable measure of internal security
being undertaken.
Our way of
is a great deal stronger
will last a great deal
than the actions of fanatics,
in number and now facing
unified world against them.
People
have confidence.
This is
battle with only one outcome:
victory not theirs.
What
on 11 September was without
in the bloody history of
.
Within a few hours,
to 7000 people were annihilated,
commercial centre of New York
reduced to rubble and in
and Pennsylvania further death and
on an unimaginable scale. Let
one say this was a
for Islam when the blood
innocent Muslims was shed along
those of the Christian, Jewish
other faiths around the world.
know those responsible. In Afghanistan
scores of training camps for
export of terror. Chief amongst
sponsors and organisers is Usama
Laden.
He is supported,
and given succour by the
regime.
Two days before the
September attacks, Masood, the Leader
the Opposition Northern Alliance, was
by two suicide bombers. Both
linked to Bin Laden. Some
call that coincidence. I call
payment - payment in the
these people deal in: blood.
in no doubt: Bin Laden
his people organised this atrocity.
Taliban aid and abet him.
will not desist from further
of terror. They will not
helping him.
Whatever the dangers
the action we take, the
of inaction are far, far
.
Look for a moment at
Taliban regime. It is undemocratic.
goes without saying.
There
no sport allowed, or television
photography. No art or culture
permitted. All other faiths, all
interpretations of Islam are ruthlessly
. Those who practice their faith
imprisoned. Women are treated in
way almost too revolting to
credible. First driven out of
; girls not allowed to go
school; no legal rights; unable
go out of doors without
man. Those that disobey are
.
There is now no contact
with western agencies, even those
food. The people live in
poverty. It is a regime
on fear and funded on
drugs trade. The biggest drugs
in the world is in
, controlled by the Taliban. Ninety
cent of the heroin on
streets originates in Afghanistan.
arms the Taliban are buying
are paid for with the
of young British people buying
drugs on British streets.
That
another part of their regime
we should seek to destroy.
what do we do?
't overreact some say. We aren't.
haven't lashed out. No
on the first night just
effect.
Don't kill innocent people.
are not the ones who
war on the innocent. We
the guilty.
Look for
diplomatic solution. There is no
with Bin Laden or the
regime.
State an ultimatum and
their response. We stated the
; they haven't responded.
Understand the
of terror. Yes, we should
, but let there be no
ambiguity about this: nothing could
justify the events of 11
, and it is to turn
on its head to pretend
could.
The action we
will be proportionate; targeted; we
do all we humanly can
avoid civilian casualties. But understand
we are dealing with. Listen
the calls of those passengers
the planes. Think of the
on them, told they were
to die.
Think of
cruelty beyond our comprehension as
the screams and the anguish
the innocent, those hijackers drove
full throttle planes laden with
into buildings where tens of
worked.
They have no moral
on the slaughter of the
. If they could have murdered
7,000 but 70,000 does anyone
they would have done so
rejoiced in it?
There
no compromise possible with such
, no meeting of minds, no
of understanding with such terror.
a choice: defeat it or
defeated by it. And defeat
we must.
Any action
will be against the terrorist
of Bin Laden.
As for
Taliban, they can surrender the
; or face the consequences and
in any action the aim
be to eliminate their military
, cut off their finances, disrupt
supplies, target their troops, not
. We will put a trap
the regime.
I say to
Taliban : surrender the terrorists;
surrender power. It's your choice.
will take action at every
, national and international, in the
, in G8, in the EU,
NATO, in every regional grouping
the world, to strike at
terrorism wherever it exists.
the first time, the UN
Council has imposed mandatory obligations
all UN members to cut
terrorist financing and end safe
for terrorists.
Those that finance
, those who launder their money,
that cover their tracks are
bit as guilty as the
who commits the final act.
in this country and in
nations round the world, laws
be changed, not to deny
liberties but to prevent their
and protect the most basic
of all: freedom from terror.
extradition laws will be introduced;
rules to ensure asylum is
a front for terrorist entry.
country is proud of its
in giving asylum to those
tyranny. We will always do
. But we have a duty
protect the system from abuse.
must be overhauled radically
that from now on, those
abide by the rules get
and those that don't, can
longer play the system to
unfair advantage over others.
the world, 11 September is
Governments and people to reflect,
and change. And in this
, amidst all the talk of
and action, there is another
appearing.
There is a
together. The power of community
asserting itself. We are realising
fragile are our frontiers in
face of the world's new
.
Today conflicts rarely stay
national boundaries.
Today a
in one financial market is
in the markets of the
.
Today confidence is global; either
presence or its absence.
Today
threat is chaos; because for
with work to do, family
to balance, mortgages to pay,
to further, pensions to provide,
yearning is for order and
and if it doesn't exist
, it is unlikely to exist
.
I have long believed this
defines the new world we
in.
People say: we are
acting because it's the USA
was attacked. Double standards, they
. But when Milosevic embarked on
ethnic cleansing of Muslims in
, we acted.
The sceptics
it was pointless, we'd make
worse, we'd make Milosovic stronger
look what happened, we won,
refugees went home, the policies
ethnic cleansing were reversed and
of the great dictators of
last century, will see justice
this century.
And I
you if Rwanda happened again
as it did in 1993,
a million people were slaughtered
cold blood, we would have
moral duty to act there
. We were there in Sierra
when a murderous group of
threatened its democratically elected Government
people.
And we as
country should, and I as
Minister do, give thanks for
brilliance, dedication and sheer professionalism
the British Armed Forces.
We
't do it all. Neither can
Americans.
But the power of
international community could, together, if
chose to.
It could, with
help, sort out the blight
is the continuing conflict in
Democratic Republic of the Congo,
three million people have died
war or famine in the
decade.
A Partnership for
, between the developed and developing
based around the New African
, is there to be done
we find the will.
our side: provide more aid,
to trade; write off debt;
with good governance and infrastructure;
to the soldiers, with UN
, in conflict resolution; encouraging investment;
access to our markets so
we practise the free trade
are so fond of preaching.
it's a deal: on the
side: true democracy, no more
for dictatorship, abuses of human
; no tolerance of bad governance,
the endemic corruption of some
, to the activities of Mr
's henchmen in Zimbabwe. Proper commercial,
and financial systems.
The
, with our help, to broker
for peace and provide troops
police them.
The state
Africa is a scar on
conscience of the world. But
the world as a community
on it, we could heal
. And if we don't, it
become deeper and angrier.
We
defeat climate change if we
to. Kyoto is right. We
implement it and call upon
other nations to do so.
it's only a start.
imagination, we could use or
the technologies that create energy
destroying our planet; we could
work and trade without deforestation.
humankind was able, finally, to
industrial progress without the factory
of the 19th Century; surely
have the wit and will
develop economically without despoiling the
environment we depend upon. And
we wanted to, we could
new life into the Middle
Peace Process and we must.
state of Israel must be
recognition by all; freed from
; know that it is accepted
part of the future of
Middle East not its very
under threat. The Palestinians must
justice, the chance to prosper
in their own land, as
partners with Israel in that
.
We know that. It is
only way, just as we
in our own peace process,
Northern Ireland, there will be
unification of Ireland except by
- and there will be
return to the days of
or Protestant supremacy because those
have no place in the
world. So the unionists must
justice and equality for nationalists.
Republicans must show they
given up violence - not
a ceasefire but weapons put
use. And not only the
, but those people who call
Loyalists, but who by acts
terrorism, sully the name of
United Kingdom.
We know
also. The values we believe
should shine through what we
in Afghanistan.
To the Afghan
we make this commitment. The
will not be the end.
will not walk away, as
outside world has done so
times before.
If the Taliban
changes, we will work with
to make sure its successor
one that is broad-based, that
all ethnic groups, and that
some way out of the
poverty that is your present
.
And, more than ever now,
every bit as much thought
planning, we will assemble a
coalition alongside the military coalition
that inside and outside Afghanistan,
refugees, four and a hlf
on the move even before
September, are given shelter, food
help during the winter months.
world community must show as
its capacity for compassion as
force.
The critics will
: but how can the world
a community? Nations act in
own self-interest. Of course they
. But what is the lesson
the financial markets, climate change,
terrorism, nuclear proliferation or world
? It is that our self-interest
our mutual interests are today
woven together.
This is the
of globalisation.
I realise
people protest against globalisation.
We
aspects of it with trepidation.
feel powerless, as if we
now pushed to and fro
forces far beyond our control.
there's a risk that political
, faced with street demonstrations, pander
the argument rather than answer
. The demonstrators are right to
there's injustice, poverty, environmental degradation.
globalisation is a fact and,
and large, it is driven
people.
Not just in
, but in communication, in technology,
in culture, in recreation. In
world of the internet, information
and TV, there will be
. And in trade, the problem
not there's too much of
; on the contrary there's too
of it.
The issue is
how to stop globalisation.
issue is how we use
power of community to combine
with justice. If globalisation works
for the benefit of the
, then it will fail and
deserve to fail. But if
follow the principles that have
us so well at home
that power, wealth and opportunity
be in the hands of
many, not the few -
we make that our guiding
for the global economy, then
will be a force for
and an international movement that
should take pride in leading.
the alternative to globalisation is
.
Confronted by this reality,
the world, nations are instinctively
together. In Quebec, all the
of North and South America
to make one huge free
area, rivalling Europe. In Asia,
. In Europe, the most integrated
of all, we are now
nations. Another 12 countries negotiating
join, and more beyond that.
new relationship between Russia
Europe is beginning.
And
not India and China, each
three times as many citizens
the whole of the EU
together, once their economies have
sufficiently as they will do,
reconfigure entirely the geopolitics of
world and in our lifetime?
is why, with 60 per
of our trade dependent on
, three million jobs tied up
Europe, much of our political
engaged in Europe, it would
a fundamental denial of our
national interest to turn our
on Europe.
We will never
that happen.
For 50
, Britain has, uncharacteristically, followed not
in Europe.
At each
every step. There are debates
to our future coming up:
we reform European economic policy;
we take forward European defence;
we fight organised crime and
.
Britain needs its voice
in Europe and bluntly Europe
a strong Britain, rock solid
our alliance with the USA,
determined to play its full
in shaping Europe's destiny.
We
only be part of the
currency if the economic conditions
met. They are not window-dressing
a political decision. They are
. But if they are met,
should join, and if met
this Parliament, we should have
courage of our argument, to
the British people for their
in this Parliament.
Europe
not a threat to Britain.
is an opportunity.
It is
taking the best of the
and European models of development
Britain's hope of a prosperous
lies. The American spirit of
; the European spirit of solidarity.
have, here also, an opportunity.
just to build bridges politically,
economically.
What is the answer
the current crisis? Not isolationism
the world coming together with
as a community.
What is
answer to Britain's relations with
? Not opting out, but being
members of a community in
, in alliance with others, we
strength.
What is the answer
Britain's future? Not each person
themselves, but working together as
community to ensure that everyone,
just the privileged few get
chance to succeed.
This is
extraordinary moment for progressive politics.
values are the right ones
this age: the power of
, solidarity, the collective ability to
the individual's interests.
People ask
if I think ideology is
. My answer is:
In the
of rigid forms of economic
social theory, yes.
The
Century killed those ideologies and
passing causes little regret. But,
the sense of a governing
in politics, based on values,
. The governing idea of modern
democracy is community. Founded on
principles of social justice. That
should rise according to merit
birth; that the test of
decent society is not the
of the wealthy and strong,
the commitment to the poor
weak.
But values aren't enough.
mantle of leadership comes at
price: the courage to learn
change; to show how values
stand for all ages, can
applied in a way relevant
each age.
Our politics
succeed when the realism is
clear as the idealism.
This
's strength today comes from the
of change and learning we
made.
We learnt that however
we strive for peace, we
strong defence capability where a
approach fails.
We learnt that
is about equal worth, not
outcomes.
Today our idea of
is shaped around mutual responsibility;
deal, an agreement between citizens
a one-way gift, from the
to the dependent.
Our economic
social policy today owes as
to the liberal social democratic
of Lloyd George, Keynes and
as to the socialist principles
the 1945 Government.
Just over
decade ago, people asked if
could ever win again. Today
ask the same question of
Opposition. Painful though that journey
change has been, it has
worth it, every stage of
way.
On this journey, the
have never changed. The aims
't. Our aims would be instantly
to every Labour leader from
Hardie onwards. But the means
change.
The journey hasn't
. It never ends. The next
for New Labour is not
; it is renewing ourselves again.
after the election, an old
of mine said: "Come on
, now we've won again, can't
drop all this New Labour
do what we believe in?"
said: "It's worse than you
. I really do believe in
".
We didn't revolutionise British economic
- Bank of England independence,
spending rules - for some
reason or as a clever
to steal Tory clothes.
did it because the victims
economic incompetence - 15% interest
, 3 million unemployed- are hard-working
. They are the ones -
even more so, now -
tough times ahead - that
economy should be run for,
speculators, or currency dealers or
executives whose pay packets don't
to bear any resemblance to
performance of their companies.
Economic
is the pre-condition of social
.
We have legislated for fairness
work, like the minimum wage
people struggled a century for.
we won't give up the
flexibility of our economy or
commitment to enterprise.
Why?
in a world leaving behind
production, where technology revolutionises not
companies but whole industries, almost
, enterprise creates the jobs people
on.
We have boosted pensions,
benefit, family incomes. We will
more. But our number one
for spending is and will
education.
Why? Because in
new markets countries like Britain
only create wealth by brain
not low wages and sweatshop
.
We have cut youth unemployment
75 per cent.
By
than any Government before us.
we refuse to pay benefit
those who refuse to work.
? Because the welfare that works
welfare that helps people to
themselves.
The graffiti, the vandalism,
burnt out cars, the street
drug dealers, the teenage mugger
graduating from the minor school
crime: we're not old fashioned
right-wing to take action against
social menace.
We're standing
for the people we represent,
play by the rules and
a right to expect others
do the same.
And especially
this time let us say:
celebrate the diversity in our
, get strength from the cultures
races that go to make
Britain today; and racist abuse
racist attacks have no place
the Britain we believe in.